If we know Methane goes upward due to its density then directing all the gas toward a direction, compress it to increase the density, keep it down and further, use it however you want.
Just find use cases of its constituents which are carbon and hydrogen.
Carbon is the main component of diamonds. Just an instance.
And hydrogen is the next greatest fuel to produce no carbon footprint.
We could rather research in the uses of our bi-products of fuel usages such as carbons, hydrocarbons etc.
Similarly, the radioactive waste. Which we know are gamma and above frequencies.
If we know their frequency, can we not null them with similar frequencies?
Or harness them in simpler terms?
Please read my next article to know more about it further.
And how on earth is a researcher settling down by just saying that there’s another country that has more cows in number, but are not grown for meat and rather milk and agriculture, and so are not too big and stay alive longer, making it more time on earth for them, resulting in more emissions, hurting more of our atmosphere?
While the cows in other countries where they are used primarily for agriculture are leaner and are in atmospheres that do not have that dense a population of cows that are bigger in size (hence these cows would have a higher rate of metabolism and fat storage and muscle growth, resulting in higher volumes of resultant gases of the chemical reactions in the body of the cows during digestion processes. A very analogous example would be that a person who is fat would have more acidity problems. By which we mean that the acids in the stomach are released more than required for the food consumed. As the rate of production is not driven by the amount of food we haven eaten, and rather by the body’s size, as the body calculates the amount of acids required using the information it knows and, not that it wouldn’t know until the food has reached the acids in the stomach. Bigger the body, bigger would be the volume of acids released ahead of time, asking for a certain amount of food intake (hunger) to help the whole mass of the body survive and continue functioning. Leaner people or the right BMI holding people produce less bodily gasses or fart less, relative to a fatter person without any doubts) and hence greater producers of environmentally toxic gases such as methane. CH4 simple as that.
And so are there no problems heard in countries about livestock gases being hazardous compared to the ones that grow cows for meat consumption primarily.
And in no way would it sound appropriate to call another living being’s life span longer than we want it to be. They didn’t ask to come into this planet we brought them intentionally. To kill them. If that’s not bad enough, we complain about its life span being longer. Why don’t we make them be born at a size, we as humans can consume their meat right away? Is that a good idea to contain greenhouse gas emissions? It could perhaps fart a bit in that short lifespan too haha. Could you take that much? Or would you want the cattle to be born as a barbecued steak ready to eat? 🤣🤣
Thoughts Flow 